<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: French Vogue does Black Face?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.21maroons.com/french-vogue-does-black-face/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.21maroons.com/french-vogue-does-black-face/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 15:25:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dwbl.ldwb</title>
		<link>http://www.21maroons.com/french-vogue-does-black-face/comment-page-1/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>dwbl.ldwb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 15:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.21maroons.com/?p=2205#comment-60</guid>
		<description>there&#039;s controversy over this being done by a few publications, not just Vogue Fr, but also Allure and such.  http://www.racialicious.com/2009/10/19/allures-faces-of-the-future-promotes-stereotypes-about-mixed-people/#comment-2044266

i tend to wonder if it&#039;s just a matter of experimentation on the part of the Art Directors.  for example, what if you wanted to dress a particular model in this outfit that highlighted their body/facial structure, but actually went better with a certain skin tone?  You might bodypaint to see how it played out.

the difference is that the editors aren&#039;t intentionally blackfacing (or are they implicitly, no matter what?).  

why is it that blue, or even multicolored, body painting, as a layer of image creation, is acceptable, but black/brown is not?  [rhetorical]  obviously the answer is that the black/brown actually coincides with a preexisting social stigma. 

to me, i consider these editorials fashion experiments, esp in lieu of having a model that embodies everything that a concept asks for.  

people get too crazy about this stuff sometimes, though understandably so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there&#8217;s controversy over this being done by a few publications, not just Vogue Fr, but also Allure and such.  <a href="http://www.racialicious.com/2009/10/19/allures-faces-of-the-future-promotes-stereotypes-about-mixed-people/#comment-2044266" rel="nofollow">http://www.racialicious.com/2009/10/19/allures-faces-of-the-future-promotes-stereotypes-about-mixed-people/#comment-2044266</a></p>
<p>i tend to wonder if it&#8217;s just a matter of experimentation on the part of the Art Directors.  for example, what if you wanted to dress a particular model in this outfit that highlighted their body/facial structure, but actually went better with a certain skin tone?  You might bodypaint to see how it played out.</p>
<p>the difference is that the editors aren&#8217;t intentionally blackfacing (or are they implicitly, no matter what?).  </p>
<p>why is it that blue, or even multicolored, body painting, as a layer of image creation, is acceptable, but black/brown is not?  [rhetorical]  obviously the answer is that the black/brown actually coincides with a preexisting social stigma. </p>
<p>to me, i consider these editorials fashion experiments, esp in lieu of having a model that embodies everything that a concept asks for.  </p>
<p>people get too crazy about this stuff sometimes, though understandably so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
